
The thought has occurred to me often in life that too much of a good thing is, in fact, not such a good thing. I'm sure many of you have had these thoughts as well. When does one know when to draw the line between offering aid to a person or to a community and when to stop and let that person/community fend for themselves? The local volunteer organizations are faced with that same question regarding the village of Kurland at this very moment. The dilemma seems to be two-fold (in actuality it is much more complicated than that, but these are the two major points as I understand them, based on many conversations and a couple of weeks of observations).
First of all...there are a number of aid organizations in the area that donate time, money, materials, food, land, etc. to the community. However, there is not an overall structure for these organizations to allow them to work together, or to help direct the donations of well-meaning people who may, for instance, want to donate land for a new rugby pitch, when there is already one in the community. Therefore, several similar projects may be going on at the same time without much understanding of what, why or who is the end recipient of the aid. The donations and volunteers are much appreciated by all, but I can't help but think how powerful these organizations and the money behind them could be if they worked together to raise funds, choose and carry-out projects, and provide on-going support, etc.
Secondly...there is the issue of the community wanting to change. One can't help but wonder if they have become used to their lot in life and a revolving door of volunteers and newly erected buildings that they believe this is how life has always been and how it always should be. On the one hand, yes, mankind should always strive to help each other, but on the other hand, it is difficult to continue to provide for people who seem uninterested in changing. For example, some seem to prefer to throw their garbage in the streets rather than pay the R7 a week (approx. $1) for garbage removal. When a fenced in area was built by volunteers to contain the garbage, the lumber gradually disappeared for people to use on their own homes (and who can blame them for wanting a simple 2x4?) Some would rather let their pigs roam free rather than pay a small fee to have them contained in a community pen. Please note that these are generalizations and not all of the community is of this mindset. However, all that are a part of the community seem content to let it be.
I am told that this is a three-generational change. The adults who are going through it now are fighting because it is different. Their children will be educated in these changes and understand and embrace them more fully. Finally, their children's children will not remember life any differently and that is when the change will have taken root and the community can hopefully thrive on its own.
So...I am left pondering the question if changing one person at a time is enough...is it possible to achieve breakthrough changes in a community like this, or must we settle for small-scale changes? In this community, I can be inspired by the fact that there are local organizations that care and that will fight for those changes. Good Work and Keep it Up!
First of all...there are a number of aid organizations in the area that donate time, money, materials, food, land, etc. to the community. However, there is not an overall structure for these organizations to allow them to work together, or to help direct the donations of well-meaning people who may, for instance, want to donate land for a new rugby pitch, when there is already one in the community. Therefore, several similar projects may be going on at the same time without much understanding of what, why or who is the end recipient of the aid. The donations and volunteers are much appreciated by all, but I can't help but think how powerful these organizations and the money behind them could be if they worked together to raise funds, choose and carry-out projects, and provide on-going support, etc.
Secondly...there is the issue of the community wanting to change. One can't help but wonder if they have become used to their lot in life and a revolving door of volunteers and newly erected buildings that they believe this is how life has always been and how it always should be. On the one hand, yes, mankind should always strive to help each other, but on the other hand, it is difficult to continue to provide for people who seem uninterested in changing. For example, some seem to prefer to throw their garbage in the streets rather than pay the R7 a week (approx. $1) for garbage removal. When a fenced in area was built by volunteers to contain the garbage, the lumber gradually disappeared for people to use on their own homes (and who can blame them for wanting a simple 2x4?) Some would rather let their pigs roam free rather than pay a small fee to have them contained in a community pen. Please note that these are generalizations and not all of the community is of this mindset. However, all that are a part of the community seem content to let it be.
I am told that this is a three-generational change. The adults who are going through it now are fighting because it is different. Their children will be educated in these changes and understand and embrace them more fully. Finally, their children's children will not remember life any differently and that is when the change will have taken root and the community can hopefully thrive on its own.
So...I am left pondering the question if changing one person at a time is enough...is it possible to achieve breakthrough changes in a community like this, or must we settle for small-scale changes? In this community, I can be inspired by the fact that there are local organizations that care and that will fight for those changes. Good Work and Keep it Up!



